Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-17114085-20151012143446/@comment-5543592-20151014233928

HumbleDaedricServant wrote: Just pointing a few things out here, since I only got back home.

This is rather insensitive, and it's as if you made it clear you don't want her in power. Seriously? This isn't a coup. We're not throwing you out, no one has anything against anyone- if they do, then it's a tad immature to strike them of there position because of it. This is not an overthrown it's, as it says at the top of the thread, a "re-evaluation." It means that some do not think the chat mods are active enough.

And I agree. Seldom do I see a chat mod. I have seen Humble, who left the wiki for a long period of time, more often in chat than the chat mods themselves. Some have broughten up points as to why they are inactive. While explanations are good, that does not mean an inactive chat mod should continue being a chat mod. A chat mod needs to be active. An excuse doesn't change the fact that their role hasn't been fufilled adequately enough, and that they need to be replaced by those who can. Nothing against them, that's just how it works. We can't keep people in their positions out of sympathy, that would be senseless and largey inefficent. The people in these positons need to be the ones who can best manage them.