Board Thread:Roleplaying/@comment-17114085-20160205120927/@comment-29559990-20160313140800

Harold Burned-Mane wrote: (@Daedra: Dragon's Glade is a town, they will never accept vassalage without fighting. 50,000 gold for 5,000 each month is too little of an investment. My investment for a 5,000 gold extra was 100,000 gold and it is taking over 6 months to finish construction. Also you can only train 100 per month, no more than that. That is since you marshal has to personally oversee the training.

Ps.: We are timeskipping to the next year as soon as Pacman and Sunny are done with their respective battles. Don't start a war with Dragon's Glade until then.) (So, towns and villages won't accept Vassalage, all diplomatic missions end in bloody violence, and the only real way to change a culture is by military strength. So what am I supposed to do with my Chancellor? You have taken everything he could possibly do and removed it.)

Next thing, no where in the rules and guidelines did it state that towns would never accept vassalage. Neither did it say that all forts were filled with bandits. This was a recurring problem in the last RP, as well. Every settlement, not a few or most, ALL settlements were filled with the toughest sons a bitches looking to maim and murder everyone who came near. I wouldn't mind if you said "Chancellors attempts to sway Dragon Glade", failed, but to say All towns won't accept vassalage is ridiculous.

And, in the rule blog, it is stated "Cost of improvements varies, depending on what they are building and how long it will take to build it,". Where in the blue hell is it stated that I need 100,000 to make a 5,000 improvement? You just said keep it reasonable, and I found 50,000 gold invested to make 1/10th of that every month, is pretty reasonable. And don't use 100,000 as a point of argument, because as it is stated in the Rule  Blog, the cost of improvement VARIES. And where did I say that this would be finished immediately?

And, what's with that 100 soldier rule. Again, never was that said in the rule blog. And is that really all the man can train? I paid the income, I had the fieldmarshal, and we're skipping to next year anyways (Which completes the training, at that rate), so whats the problem? You say I can't because the fieldmarshal has to oversee the training, but that's like saying I can't put two peices of bread into the toaster because I have to oversee one of them.

But seeing as how you have a growing dislike for me, I suppose I'm not going to win this argument. I'll conform to your spur of the moment rule changes you love to hit me with.)