Board Thread:Off-Topic/@comment-17114085-20160110150222/@comment-24696651-20160111000739

That's fair enough, it's just that some areas (like for instance the pass in the Jerall Mountains between Riften and Falkreath) where placing a fort could really change the tide of a war.

Nothing to say about revolts and differing religions/cultures, that seems like it's sorted.

Basically, uprgrading infrastructure can be done and is left to the players discretion. It might make sense to take an approach more similar to High King and have the GM decide the magnitude of the effect.

Will vassals have their own court? Obviously, unless it is a player which has been vassalised it would be unreasonable to expect it to be fully RPed, but it would make sense that a vassal Jarl would have their own council to sort stuff out.

I guess for supplies, we could make them a necessary part of sieges, or perhaps a really distant force (across an ocean or something), but otherwise they'd only come up if someone started messing with them.

Also, would vassals function as they do in CKII? So you could only vassalise people of lower rank, and would have to own all the Jarldoms in your realm personally until you ascended in rank. If that was the case, would there be a rank equivalent to Duke (above Jarl, below King)?