Board Thread:Roleplaying/@comment-17114085-20160205120927/@comment-17114085-20160303185731

(@Red: Actually, you're not entirely aware of the current situation. Using that gif as an example: those soldiers in the south are pretty much all dead, because they would not be able to fight against an army much larger than them for long. By the time they were surrounded by the upper and side soldiers, the bottom soldiers would be non-existent. Hence how the cavalry circle up around the other soldiers and attacked the soldiers.

Especially since, using that gif as an example, you seperated the army into 10 camps. Meaning that the fight would be 300 vs 40 when they first attacked the southern camp, so a lot of them would be dead before the two closest side camps could reinforce. A cavalry charge could kill nearly all of them in one go. Then the battle would be around say 290+ vs 80+, again they would get smashed by the guards again. Then the next side camps would reinforce so the battle would be around 270+ vs 120+, again they keep losing because they are severely outnumbered. See where I am going with this. It doesn't matter that the other camps are coming to reinforce because they's just keep getting obliterated because they started at a 15 to 2 ration and as they are reinforce that ration doesn't change much.

That gif is wrong because those bottom soldiers would not be able to survive long enough to allow their comrades to completely surround the guard army. Remember that this battlefield is huge. That village has hundreds of buildings, so it is very wide. Those upper camps are around 600 meters + the whole length of the village away from the bottom camps. Since they'd have set up the camps a good 300 meters from the edges of the village.



I also fixed the proportions of the camp soldiers, since some of them didn't appear to be 40 soldiers when compared to the 300 red guards.)