Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-17114085-20151012143446/@comment-5614539-20151015062144

HumbleDaedricServant wrote: As I said, I am not taking sides regarding this matter.. Not only that, you also accused me and Data of something we did not commit. Data only gave his opinion, and so did I. You clearly bashed our opinions with your own post. Opinions are opinions, not suggestions.

Just to point a few things out, you also made it clear that you have attacked HLL by referring to her multiple times. Also, drop-in-drop-out monitoring is also a thing, as one can't expect someone to sit somewhere for hours while nothing is happening.

@HDS I'm not 'bashing' on your opinions, HDS, I'm offering opinions in exchange, and using things you've said, in the way you said, to refute them. Furthermore to the fact, I stated something that seemed clear; you're saying we're coveting power - nobody is nominating themselves, merely evaluating the current chat mods.

And I'm also not trying to give you a bad name, I was pointing out what you said, and then explaining how you in fact did accuse Sunny. You tried to give her a bad name.

HDS - you have defended HLL and Tate, without giving any counter-reasons as to why they should be removed from their roles. That is taking sides.

I referred to HLL multiple times. I referred to Tate multiple times. I referred to Mirk once, but he himself said that there needs to be active chat mods. Your point?

@HLL: Your first and last paragraphs are contradictory. Can you also please state a direct example as to where I insulted you?

HLL, if you spend all day today on chat when attention has actually been drawn towards your lack of being there-ness, it doesn't really make up for the last few months when you haven't been there. It just seems like you attempting to retain your job.

I don't quite no what you mean when referring to Data and HDS - clarification please?

How exactly have I contradicted myself? And at what point have we proposed a replacement should the existing chat mods be voted out? We haven't. This is a review, not a nomination.

Uh... That's how votes work. There's no new poll asking, "Should BobJones12345 become a chat mod?", therefore how could it be a nomination. If we were to elect new chat mods, we would have to vote you out first. Just because a vote is leaning towards removing the existing chat mods, it is not a nomination, because no replacement is being proposed.